How Do Students’ Cognitive Style Influence Their Mathematical Problem-Solving Thinking Procesess: A systematic Literature Review
Kata Kunci:
cognitive style, math problem solving, PjBL, PBLAbstrak
This study aims to explore the influence of students' cognitive styles on the thought process in solving mathematical problems through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach with PRISMA guidelines. Cognitive styles such as field-dependent vs. field-independent and reflective vs. impulsive are proven to influence the way students process information, represent mathematical concepts, and apply problem-solving strategies. A review of 10 selected articles showed that active learning models such as Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) are more effective when adapted to students' cognitive characteristics. Field-independent and reflective students tend to excel in analytical and logical thinking, while field-dependent and impulsive students perform better in collaboration when given appropriate scaffolding. The findings also suggest a link between cognitive styles and the development of 21st century skills, particularly critical thinking, creativity, communication and collaboration. This study recommends the importance of learning design that is responsive to individual differences to support the achievement of optimal learning outcomes.
Referensi
Aldaihani, H. A., K.M. Shuqair, A.M. Alotaibi, & S. Alrabah. 2015. Students ’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the english program taught at the college of technological studies in kuwait. English Language Teaching 8(4): 80-89. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n4p80
Booker, Z. 2020. A revised logic model for educational program evaluation. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 18(2): 2- 14. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1604190300
Cintamulya, I., I.Murtini, W. Warli. 2024. Optimizing collaboration and communication skills of pre-service biology teachers based on cognitive styles through scientific paper tasks iin murtini warli warli. Participatory Educational Research 11(6): 262–279.
Evendi, E., A.K.A Kusaeri, M. H. H. Pardi, F. Bayani, & S. Prayogi. 2022. Assessing students ’ critical thinking skills viewed from cognitive style : Study on implementation of problem-based e-learning model in mathematics courses. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18(7): 1-15.
Habeahan, W. L., M. Malik, M.H. Firdaus, C. Panjaitan, A. Medicom, & P. Cendana. 2025. The influence of cognitive style on abstraction ability and mathematical problem-solving in problem-based learning. Alacrity : Journal Of Education 5(1): 554–561.
Harjono, A., Gunawan, A. Busyairi, & S. Prayogi. 2024. Implementation of project-based learning to enhance the creativity of prospective physics teachers in generating learning media viewed from cognitive styles. International Journal of Education and Practice 2(2): 253–267. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i2.3676
Herlina, S., R. Wahyuni, D. Julianti, & A. Novianti. 2024. Bransford & stein theory : mathematical thinking process of prospective mathematics teacher students in solving statistical problems based on cognitive learning style. PRISMA 13(2): 245-258. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v13i2.4844
Jesus, S. N. De., A.M. Araújo, J. Viseu, I. Azevedo, & M. De. F. Morais. 2015. Intervention program on adolescent ’ s creativity representations and academic programa de intervenção nas representações de criatividade e motivação acadêmica de adolescentes programa de intervención en representaciones de creatividad y motivación académica de adolescentes. Paidéia 25(62): 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272562201502
Lubna, Suhirman, S. Prayogi. 2023. Evaluation of STEM students ’critical thinking in terms of cognitive style through problem-based distance learning. Journal Of Education and e- Learning Research 10(3): 557–568. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4972
Nur, A. S., Kartono, Zaenuri, Rochmad. 2022. The lateral thinking processes in solving mathematical word problems reviewed at adversity quotient and reflective. Journal of Mathematics Education 11(2): 223–236.
Purnamasari, I., R. Juliawan, & N. Ramdani. 2024. Analysis of students ’ problem-solving abilities based on. Journal Pedidikan Matematika 8(3): 542–554.
Salam, M. 2023. Cognitive conflict strategy : mathematical representation based on cognitive style. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 12(2): 339-350..
Setiawan, A., Wawan, Koderi, & W. Pratiwi. 2020. The effect of cognitive styles on reasoning and problem solving ability. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices 1(2): 87-93.
Setiyani., Gunawan, S.B.Waluya, Y.L. Sukestiyarno, A.N. Cahyono, & W.Yunianto. 2025. The role of scaffolding in shaping reflective mathematical thinking of dependent field students in numeracy problems. Journal of Mathematics Education 14(2): 531–550.
Supriandi. 2023. Pengembangan keterampilan kritis dan kreatif melalui pendidikan berbasis masalah : pendekatan praktis di kelas (studi pada salah satu sekolah dasar di Sukabumi). Jurnal Pendidikan West Science 1(5): 316–327.
Thahir, R., N. Magfirah, Anisa. 2024. Analisis keterampilan komunikasi dan keterampilan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi 7(1): 33–42.
Yanti, A. W., I.K. Budayasa, & R. Sulaiman. 2021. Adaptive reasoning , mathematical problem solving and cognitive styles. Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika 5(2): 332–339.
Universitas PGRI Silampari Mayor Toha Street, Lubuklinggau City, South Sumatera, Indonesia, zip code: 31628, Telepon: (0733) 451432 
